Banking and insurance
Statutory and committee work affecting chartered institutions, captives, reinsurance, and related products.
Texas Government Affairs Specialty
Financial-services legislation often turns on highly technical rules whose effects extend far beyond statutory language. Em Dash Strategies provides Texas lobbying and government affairs representation informed by directing the House committee that hears much of that work.
Work
Statutory and committee work affecting chartered institutions, captives, reinsurance, and related products.
Public Funds Investment Act issues, state fund investment policy, and how local governments invest.
New products that still have to fit inside old committee jurisdiction.
Custody, reserves, and state investment experiments treated as financial services, not as a side quest.
Reading the technical rule — the definition, the exemption, the audit duty — that actually changes a business.
How financial bills are prepared, witnessed, amended, and coordinated with the Senate and regulators.
Institutional background
This is one of the practice’s strongest institutional pages: Katy directed the House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services, and she brought appropriations experience to the same set of issues.
House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services
February 2023 – February 2025
House Committee on Appropriations
January 2020 – January 2021
Representative Giovanni Capriglione
November 2014 – August 2026
Record
Financial services here is broader than digital assets. The examples below are chosen to show that range.
Money-market and investment-procedure updates for public funds.
Captive insurance and reinsurance policy — a technical insurance file with real capital consequences.
Further Public Funds Investment Act and investment issues.
Investment-policy reform for the Rainy Day Fund.
Service-provider and customer-protection rules that landed as financial legislation.
A state investment experiment that still has to be explained as public-finance policy.
Tax treatment of transaction rebate payments involving stock exchanges and members — market-structure detail with fiscal effects.
Landscape
The danger in financial-services advocacy is treating the caption as the bill. A two-page amendment to investment procedure can move more money than a speech about innovation. Captive insurance language can change who may bear risk. A rebate-tax provision can alter the economics of a market-structure product without ever using the word “securities” in a way a non-specialist would notice.
That is why committee staff experience matters here. The work is to isolate the operative rule, identify the regulator who will inherit it, and explain the downstream effect to offices that may only see the bill for a week. Stakeholder lists in this field are long: banks, insurers, public-fund investors, FinTechs, exchanges, and now digital-asset platforms. They do not want the same outcome.
Appropriations experience is part of the same craft. Some financial-policy changes are free in fiscal-note terms and expensive in the real world. Some require a rider. Knowing the difference keeps a client from winning a policy fight and losing the implementation.
Organizations
Institutions watching technical amendments that do not look technical in a press release.
Firms affected by public-funds rules or state investment-policy debates.
Companies whose product is new and whose committee is old.
Exchanges and related businesses whose Texas issue may be tax, disclosure, or investment law.
Custodians and platforms that are, in Texas, often financial-services clients.
Groups that have to reconcile members with conflicting balance sheets and identical bill numbers.
Questions
Em Dash Strategies is an Austin-based Texas lobbying firm led by Katy Aldredge, who served as Committee Director of the House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services from February 2023 to February 2025. The practice covers banking, insurance, investments, securities-adjacent issues, FinTech, public funds, payments, and the digital-asset statutes that now sit in the same building.
Beyond directing the Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Committee, Katy’s staff work included Public Funds Investment Act updates, captive insurance and reinsurance policy, Economic Stabilization Fund investment reform, digital asset custody rules, the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and tax treatment of certain stock-exchange transaction rebate payments. She also directed the House Appropriations Committee, which is often where financial-policy ideas meet the cost of implementing them.
More than people outside the process expect. Public-funds investment procedure, insurance structures such as captives, state fund investment policy, digital asset service providers, and tax treatment of market-structure payments have all been live legislative files. The Legislature also overlaps with federal law and with state regulators. A bill caption that says “finance” may actually be about pensions, banking, insurance, or a novel asset class.
Yes. FinTech issues in Texas rarely arrive labeled as such. They arrive as payments, data, custody, lending, or insurance questions assigned to a financial committee or to an agency with a financial charter. The firm’s job is to place the product on that map and then run a conventional legislative and agency process around it.
Yes, and it treats them as a connected file rather than as two websites. HB 1666 and SB 21 were financial-policy instruments. So were older Public Funds Investment Act and Rainy Day Fund investment bills. Clients that straddle both worlds should not have to hire two theories of the Texas Legislature.
Continue
Em Dash Strategies helps businesses and organizations understand the landscape, develop a strategy, and navigate Texas government.
Discuss Your Issue